![[?]](https://romanzolotarev.com/logo.png){kind=logo}
is there an official #openbsd policy regarding the use of generative ai/llms for producing code, patches, or documentation?
...
Older...
![[?]](https://media.bsd.cafe/bsdmmedia01/accounts/avatars/113/407/688/140/177/903/original/de6c43fbc2be3c55.jpg)
I haven't seen anything official come out, but I suspect it could be summarized with "get bent" followed by a stream of profanity π
![[?]](https://gts.tumfatig.net/fileserver/01FJ093H6Y5VGN20G998J7KN1M/attachment/original/01JZTJV1P9RVJ502PCXKN68R1F.jpeg)
![[?]](https://s3.masto.ai/accounts/avatars/109/364/299/865/677/226/original/ad14f95c20e22369.png)
@hi Licensing matters, and even replacing GPL with BSD licensed code has been a recurring topic in the past. Likely to prevent vommits in the future on legal grounds as well.
![[?]](https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/109/296/546/898/175/507/original/1e7521e39a5ef326.jpeg)
@hi one hasnβt been announced, but thereβs already slop-enabling software in ports like codex and llama-cpp, so the argument that AI would be laughed out of the room carries a bit less weight imo
![[?]](https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/109/313/539/469/563/778/original/985300f31b2b215f.jpeg)
@hi I agree that itβs only speculation until someone with commit bit declares the policy, but Iβd wager the only way development with AI makes it intentionally into Base is in one of their infamous April 1 announcements.
![[?]](https://honk.vedetta.com/meme/e5936670a5e03747.png)